Don't get stuck in an endless loop of testing — modifying — testing — modifying. By the time a product finally makes it through an unplanned testing process, it may already be obsolete. A well-structured EMC test and control plan — developed before testing begins — is the single most effective way to reach compliance on schedule and on budget.
An EMC test and control plan is a structured document that defines everything needed to conduct a compliance testing program efficiently — which tests to perform, which standards apply, how the product will be configured during testing, what constitutes a pass or fail for each test, the order in which tests will be run, and how test data will be documented and used for regulatory submissions.
Test planning is the first step in the compliance testing process and is often the most overlooked. Without a plan, manufacturers frequently discover mid-test that a critical standard was missed, that the EUT configuration was not representative of production intent, or that performance criteria were not agreed upon before immunity testing began — all of which cause delays, retesting, and cost overruns that proper upfront planning would have prevented.
Compatible Electronics can provide guidance and assistance in developing your EMC test and control plans in accordance with well-established industry standards. By determining your specific regulatory goals and target markets, we can assist in identifying the applicable standards and structuring a test program designed to achieve those objectives efficiently from a single laboratory engagement.
💡 The Compatible Electronics Advantage: Our test and control plan guidance is grounded in 40+ years of direct compliance testing experience across FCC, CE marking, medical device, industrial, and international programs — we know which planning decisions determine whether a first-attempt test passes or requires retesting.
A comprehensive EMC test and control plan addresses all phases of the compliance testing program — from standard selection and EUT preparation through data documentation and regulatory submission. The following elements form the foundation of an effective plan:
Define the product, its intended markets, and the regulatory frameworks that apply — FCC, CE marking under EMC Directive 2014/30/EU, IEC 60601-1-2 for medical devices, IEC 61326-1 for measurement equipment, and applicable international standards. Clearly bound what is and is not included in the test program.
Define the overall approach — which standards will be tested, in what order, at which laboratory location(s), and how multi-market data reuse will be structured. A well-developed strategy maximizes the number of regulatory compliance packages supported by a single test session — for example, FCC Part 15B + EN 55032 + ICES-003 conducted and radiated emissions from one set of measurements.
Document every applicable regulatory requirement for every target market: specific standard versions (e.g., EN 55032 (2015)+A11(2020) vs. CISPR 32 Ed 2.0), applicable clauses, limit classes (Class A vs. Class B), frequency ranges, and any product-specific requirements derived from the product family standard's particular requirements sections.
Establish the testing timeline aligned with the product's development milestones — pre-compliance testing dates, formal compliance submission dates, Declaration of Conformity target date, and product launch date. Build in contingency time for retesting if first-attempt failures occur. Identify long-lead items such as antenna site availability or specialized test equipment booking.
Reference the specific test procedures that will be followed — ANSI C63.4 for FCC conducted and radiated emissions, CISPR 16-2-3 for radiated emissions in a semi-anechoic chamber, IEC 61000-4-2 through 4-11 for the applicable immunity tests. Document any deviations from standard procedures that may be required for the specific product.
Define the EUT's operational state during each test — which software/firmware version, which operating modes, which peripheral cables connected, which ports terminated, which functions active. For emissions testing, identify the worst-case operating mode. For immunity testing, identify the representative operational function that will be monitored for performance criterion assessment.
Assign ownership for each phase: who prepares the EUT, who selects and provides ancillary equipment and cables, who monitors product function during immunity testing, who reviews test data, who authorizes the Declaration of Conformity. Identify any specialized resources required — customer-specific test fixtures, product-specific software monitoring tools, or application specialists.
Define the specific measurement criteria for each test — which limit lines apply (FCC Part 15B Class B, EN 55032 Class B, or Class A), which measurement detectors are required (quasi-peak, average, peak), which frequency ranges are mandatory, and which antenna polarizations and turntable positions are required for radiated emissions sweeps.
Define precisely what constitutes acceptable product behavior during each immunity test — Criterion A (normal performance maintained), Criterion B (temporary degradation acceptable, self-recovery), or Criterion C (operator intervention permitted). For safety-critical products such as alarm systems (EN 50130-4), medical devices (IEC 60601-1-2), or industrial controllers (IEC 61326-1), these criteria must be documented and agreed upon before immunity testing begins.
Define the conditions under which testing will be paused or terminated — product damage, catastrophic failure exceeding the standard's allowed performance criteria, or a failure so far above the limit that further testing provides no useful data until a design change is made. Pre-agreeing on suspension criteria prevents wasted test time and protects the EUT.
Define what must be completed before testing can resume after a suspension — design modification, firmware change, EUT replacement, or standard procedure review. Document which previously completed tests must be repeated after an EUT modification to ensure that a change that fixes one failure has not introduced a new problem.
Identify all external dependencies that could affect the test schedule — regulatory guidance document interpretations, third-party module certifications that must be in place before host testing, product hardware revisions in progress, software releases needed before specific test configurations are valid, or antenna site availability at specific laboratory locations.
Define the test documentation deliverables — NVLAP accredited test report format, required photographs and EUT description, measurement uncertainty statement, Declaration of Conformity template, technical file structure for CE marking, and any additional documentation required by the target regulatory authority (e.g., FCC equipment authorization application package, FDA 510(k) test report format).
The elements of a test plan vary significantly depending on the applicable standard. Compatible Electronics' 40+ years of testing experience across our full NVLAP accreditation scope informs practical, standard-specific planning guidance:
Compatible Electronics works with your engineering and regulatory team to develop a test plan that aligns compliance requirements with your product's development schedule and certification goals:
Define all target markets and regulatory frameworks — FCC, CE marking (EMC Directive, LVD, RED), IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 61326-1, ISED Canada, RCM, VCCI, KC, and others. Determine the authorization type required for each market (self-declaration, certification body, or third-party lab report).
Identify the specific standard(s) applicable to the product category — product family standard where available, generic standard otherwise. Confirm the current harmonized standard version listed in the EU Official Journal for CE marking projects. Identify any standard transitions in progress that affect the test program timeline.
Define the EUT configuration for each test — which hardware revision, firmware version, peripheral cables, ancillary equipment, and operating modes represent worst-case emissions and representative immunity scenarios. For complex products with multiple configurations, prioritize the configurations to minimize test time while maintaining regulatory defensibility.
Agree on documented performance criteria for each immunity test before testing begins — especially critical for products where "normal performance" is ambiguous (medical devices, alarm systems, industrial controllers). Document the specific output signals, display states, or communication functions that will be monitored during each immunity test, and define the acceptable deviation range for Criterion A, B, and C compliance.
Structure the test order to maximize efficiency — typically emissions tests before immunity (to avoid chamber time for a product that may need design changes), and destructive tests (surge, ESD) last within each test session. For multi-market programs, sequence tests to collect data satisfying multiple standards simultaneously from a single EUT configuration.
Develop a testing schedule aligned with the product's development milestones, pre-compliance testing windows, and formal submission dates. Define all documentation deliverables — NVLAP accredited test report, Declaration of Conformity template, technical file structure, and any regulatory submission package requirements specific to the target markets.
A consumer electronics manufacturer was preparing a Wi-Fi 6/Bluetooth 5.2 IoT gateway for simultaneous US, EU, and Canadian market launch. Without a coordinated test plan, the preliminary plan from their regulatory consultant called for three separate test sessions. Compatible Electronics developed a unified test plan that identified that ANSI C63.4 radiated and conducted emissions measurements simultaneously satisfied FCC Part 15B, EN 55032 (2015)+A11(2020) Class B, and ICES-003 Issue 7 — with only minor supplemental measurements needed for each. The EUT configuration was defined to represent the worst-case emissions mode (Wi-Fi 6 active, all Bluetooth LE advertising channels active, maximum Ethernet throughput) and the same configuration was used for all three markets' data. The five-element multi-market test plan — emissions, immunity, ESD, surge, and conducted RF — was completed in a single test session at Lake Forest/Silverado, reducing total test time by 40% versus separate submissions.
An industrial automation manufacturer was preparing a PLC expansion module for IEC 61326-1 (2012) testing for CE marking under the EMC Directive. Before testing, the customer's engineer and Compatible Electronics jointly documented the performance criteria for each immunity test — specifically, that the module's analog outputs must remain within ±2% of their setpoint (Criterion A) during all immunity tests except IEC 61000-4-11 voltage dips (Criterion B permitted). The performance criterion documentation identified a disagreement between the manufacturer's EU-market engineering team (who defined Criterion A as ±1%) and the test lab interpretation (±2% per IEC 61326-1 Annex A guidance). Resolving this before testing began — rather than during the test when lab time is running — prevented a potential re-test scenario. The formal IEC 61326-1 test was completed in the industrial environment with all performance criteria pre-agreed, and the test report reflected the documented and accepted criteria.
A medical device startup developing a Class II non-life-supporting diagnostic instrument needed to align their IEC 60601-1-2 Ed. 4 compliance test plan with an FDA 510(k) submission timeline 14 months out. Compatible Electronics developed a test plan that began with pre-compliance testing at 6 months (prototype stage) — ESD spot checks on all patient-facing interfaces and radiated emissions pre-scans — to identify high-risk design areas before PCB finalization. The formal IEC 60601-1-2 Ed. 4 test plan defined the equipment as professional healthcare facility environment, identified all ports (AC mains, patient leads, RS-232 data output, USB service port), documented essential performance as the instrument's measurement output remaining within ±5% of its calibrated accuracy value, and set Criterion A for all immunity tests on the patient-connected ports. The test plan also included the IEC 60601-1-2 Ed. 4 Table 9 immunity test levels for professional healthcare facility and mapped each test to the specific IEC 61000-4 sub-test. The product passed all IEC 60601-1-2 Ed. 4 tests at Newbury Park on the first formal submission attempt, supporting the 510(k) submission on schedule.
Identifying the right tests, configurations, and performance criteria before testing begins prevents the most common cause of compliance program delays — discovering mid-test that a key standard was missed or a configuration was wrong.
A coordinated multi-market test plan structures measurements so that FCC, CE marking, ISED Canada, RCM, and VCCI compliance data is collected simultaneously — reducing total test cost by up to 60% versus separate submissions.
Documenting and agreeing on performance criteria before immunity testing begins prevents disputes about what constitutes a pass or fail — especially critical for medical devices, alarm systems, and industrial controllers.
A compliance schedule integrated with development milestones ensures that pre-compliance testing, formal testing, and Declaration of Conformity issuance align with the product's market launch date — not after it.
A documented test plan forms part of the EU technical file and supports the Declaration of Conformity. For FDA submissions, it documents the test strategy and rationale. For FCC authorizations, it supports the equipment authorization application.
Compatible Electronics test plan guidance is grounded in direct laboratory experience — we know from thousands of test programs which planning decisions have the greatest impact on first-attempt compliance success.
Talk to our specialists today — we can help you identify the right standards, define your test configuration, establish performance criteria, and structure a compliance program that meets your market window.
Brea: 714‑579‑0500 · Newbury Park: 805‑480‑4044
www.celectronics.com